Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Why 338 Lapua over 338 RUM?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    11,063
    Feedback Score
    41 (98%)

    Why 338 Lapua over 338 RUM?

    Looking at the specs they are very close. Why has the 338RUM not caught onto the LR precision crew more?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Up state NY
    Posts
    3,037
    Feedback Score
    19 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Belmont31R View Post
    Looking at the specs they are very close. Why has the 338RUM not caught onto the LR precision crew more?
    I think its just the tactical market your looking at. As far as long range hunting goes its a very popular round. Especaly in savage and howa actions. The trend seams to be faster and faster but that all translates to $$$$. The fact is you can buy rum brass for half what you pay for the lapua stuff.

    I myself have gone over this again and again in my head and when its time to move to the new barrel in my Howa it will be the 338 RUM.
    "After I shot myself, my training took over and I called my parents..." Texas Grebner

    "Take me with a grain of salt, my sarcasm does not relate well over the internet"

    Jonathan Morehouse

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    NM
    Posts
    3,987
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    It's not like the 338LM has great barrel life to begin with, the RUM seems like it would exacerbate it. Then again, anybody well heeled enough to burn out an LM barrel can probably afford that without a second glance.

    I personally don't see how handloading LM doesn't keep up really well in terms of cost/performance with the RUM - but then again I don't see a requirement for most of the UM/SM cartridges that exist.
    عندما تصبح الأسلحة محظورة, قد يملكون حظرون عندهم فقط
    کله چی سلاح منع شوی دی، یوازي غلوونکۍ یی به درلود
    Semper Fi
    "Being able to do the basics, on demand, takes practice. " - Sinister

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    231
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Agree the performance is there but I do think the fact that LM is a military round has cemented its foothold in the LR market. This isnt a bad thing as much info is available from end users on loads and ammo combinations. Makes establishing a base line to start much easier.

    Also agree RUM is a barrel burrner and that plays in heavily when considering a round for a routine shooter compared to a once a year hunter.

    On the flip side commercial RUM ammo is easier to find in the local shops than LM although usually in some flavor of a hunting round not a match load.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    78
    Feedback Score
    0
    I think it has something to do with the neck length, IRRC.

    You might want to check out the .338 Edge: .300 RUM brass with .338 bullets, specifically the 300 grain SMKs.....

    If I had the need and time, I would go down this path.

    http://www.longrangehunting.com/rifles/lrr-338-edge.php

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DU6HAIm1pX4

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Up state NY
    Posts
    3,037
    Feedback Score
    19 (100%)
    There is also a 338 EDGE +p now to 300g SMK at 3000fps
    "After I shot myself, my training took over and I called my parents..." Texas Grebner

    "Take me with a grain of salt, my sarcasm does not relate well over the internet"

    Jonathan Morehouse

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    144
    Feedback Score
    0
    300gr smk at 3k is smoking. When I rebarrel, I am definatly looking at the 338 rum instead of the LM. I don't buy off the shelf ammo but in a pinch it is much cheaper than the LM. I wish that lapua would make the 300 or for that matter 338 rum cases. Right now finding remington 300rum cases is kind of hard to do. You can get them in the nosler offerings but hard to find in remington.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Up state NY
    Posts
    3,037
    Feedback Score
    19 (100%)
    Nosler is every bit as good as Lapua I use both and have not seean any discernable diffrence between the two.
    "After I shot myself, my training took over and I called my parents..." Texas Grebner

    "Take me with a grain of salt, my sarcasm does not relate well over the internet"

    Jonathan Morehouse

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    332
    Feedback Score
    0
    338 Tejas - 300 grain Berger at 3600 fps.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    171
    Feedback Score
    0
    All kinds of weird info in this thread.

    338LM has a barrel life somewhere around 2500-3000 rounds which is not bad. .338 RUM barrel life is almost the same as they both run the same amount of powder thru the same hole. .338 Edge is the same as a .338 RUM with a blown out shoulder.

    Biggest reason for the .338LM popularity is because you can get good brass for it. .338RUM is good because it works in a standard magnum action while the .338 LM is a bit fatter so you need larger actions. I’ve also read that .338 LM has one of the thickest cases around if brass life matters to you. Some also think short fat cartridges have an accuracy edge so that’s another win for the LM.
    Basically hunter prefer the RUM and precision shooters prefer the .338LM.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •