Nope, firsthand. I've personally been standing there when a colt doubled on the range, and I've had one brought to me to have looked at, because it had the same problem.
This was during the Janet Reno era. You know, Waco, Ruby Ridge, etc. They weren't too concerned about "intent". Pretty sure the guy won in court, but not before spending a pretty penny on attorney's fees.
I think you know what a boutique brand is. Noveske, Vltor, POF, etc.
Sure, but again, if you have to learn from the internet that you're not supposed to be satisfied with the rifle, then that speaks well for the rifle. They can all break. S&W has a warranty too, you know... You seem to be implying that they do not.
I didn't say they're all good. I said that there's nothing wrong with his S&W, if there's nothing wrong with his S&W.
His comment indicated that he would have otherwise been happy with his purchase, if not for the internet telling him he shouldn't be; and I find that a little absurd, and quite possibly a sad reflection of the attitudes of the forum.
I'm the new kid in this forum, but based on what I've seen so far, a lot of what goes on here seems to be a big circle jerk; and, as one person put it, 'a lot of sniffing of one another's farts'.

Bookmarks