Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 40

Thread: 300 blk and gas system optimization

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    121
    Feedback Score
    0
    I have been following the development of the blackout for a while now. This is the first time I have seen a choice of pistol or carbine for a 16" barrel. Coming from you I am sure it is correct. That is great news. Does that mean I can initally set up my 16" as a pistol length then if I decide to cut it down to 11" I am still good to go?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,705
    Feedback Score
    0
    Yes, but you will have to enlarge the gas port if you cut it - which is simple to do.

    Just note - my statement was not an endorsement of every 300 BLK 16" barrel with a pistol length gas system. There are certainly bad ones for sale. I meant that I know how to make a 16 inch barrel with a pistol length gas system which would be fine.

    I still prefer carbine, just as I prefer mid-length gas on 16 inch 5.56mm rifles because it delays unlocking and has lower gas port erosion. I generally believe that the further you can move out the gas system and still remain within spec on cyclic rate, the better.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    104
    Feedback Score
    11 (100%)
    I am building a 300blk with a 10" noveske barrel pistol gas... what would be the best buffer to use with this barrel? It will be run 100% unsuppressed
    Last edited by Rwatts62081; 12-05-11 at 22:59.
    Roll Tide! National Champions: 1925, 1926, 1930, 1934, 1941, 1961, 1964, 1965, 1973, 1978, 1979, 1992, 2009, 2011, 2012

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    4,636
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    H buffer.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    50
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd.K View Post
    H buffer.
    Wouldn't an A5 run even better ?

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,705
    Feedback Score
    0
    I like the A5 concept, but I am into the CTR or SOPMOD stock.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    50
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rsilvers View Post
    I like the A5 concept, but I am into the CTR or SOPMOD stock.
    a5 tube springs & buffer with STR stock body. Best of both worlds!

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,705
    Feedback Score
    0
    Are you saying the tube is compatible with normal stocks? I thought it only worked with the Vltor stock.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    50
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rsilvers View Post
    Are you saying the tube is compatible with normal stocks? I thought it only worked with the Vltor stock.
    Of course it is; that's the beauty of it. It's just that the CTR won't collapse completely to position 0. the STR should collapse to position 0, I'll tell you after X-MAS.

    I don't know how it'll affect sub unsuppressed but for shooting supers unsuppressed it's very smooth. I'll do comparative test with some buddies in 2 weeks to compare my A5 with their C, H and H2 setup on my 110gr vmax handloads/Noveske 10".

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    4,636
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    You can use the A5 or rifle system, we test with a rifle system not just carbine.

    Vltor makes two receiver extensions, one for longer stocks like the Emod and ACS to collapse all the way and one for standard length stocks that stop about 3/4" from fully collapsed.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •