Sorry for another "this or that" thread--I've done a search and not found much by way of info on this particular subject either here or on other sites.
The next firearm I purchase will be a combat-capable rifle. To me this means reasonable (but not precision) accuracy, 0-400m range, reliable, handy, and robust. I will use this rifle for training, primarily. I am pretty happy with my current handgun and shotgun, and am looking for a carbine-ish rifle to complete my arsenal.
Right now I am pretty torn between a Noveske 16" light basic and a DSA 16"/18" FAL (possibly a para model).
I am pretty convinced that I'd rather have the ballistic performance of the .308. From searching around, I think the DSA FAL will offer me the best .308 performance for the money (not so interested in .308 ARs) That being said, I know it is more expensive and harder to shoot well than .223. I can't hunt with a .223 in my state, but I would consider a .300BLK upper down the road. Besides, I could always hunt with slugs in my shotgun.
I would just go ahead with the Noveske (understanding I'd be well-served by some other AR manufacturers as well) but the FAL seems very well regarded here and seems like a good way to get into shooting .308.
I don't care about accessories/rails/optics--I want a handy, deadly, K.I.S.S, reliable, proven weapon.
For those of you who own both platforms, what are your thoughts?
Bookmarks