Those are NOT good definitions..... There is absolutely no way you can make that statement unless all your shooting is 15 yards and under on a large target. I'm sure theres been a time that you've jerked the GI trigger pulling you off the target where a lighter crisper break would have gotten you a hit. Maybe you dont "feel" it would have but that doesnt mean much.
People upgrade too $100+ stocks all the time.....What so bad about a CAR stock that would get you 10-15% less hits???
Since when is the cost of proficiency directly proportional to the cost of a new rifle anyway??? Do the guys who pay $800 for their 7th training class that basically covers the same thing all the sudden become 80% better? I dont hear anyone calling that a bad idea. The answer is no but even if that $800 makes them 2% more proficient that may be their life. Same idea with GA triggers.
On a side note.....Since 3 gun competitors etc. are extremely concerned with their proficiency i am wondering if the majority are using stock GI triggers or something more expensive in their Ar's? (i honestly dont know the answer to this) Nobody questions GA triggers reliability.



Reply With Quote
I've never heard anyone say that.
Bookmarks