CZ-75/85

[Redmanfms]

I'm looking at buying another 9mm to add to my collection of Berettas and want to try something different, just because. I've shot the CZ-75 and it left a very pleasant impression, but I've read/heard of issues with the later pistols (Bs) related to the firing pin safeties.

Does anybody have solid experience with them? Anybody here ever use them in a class/competition?

Thanks for any input.

[TY44934]

I'm looking at buying another 9mm to add to my collection of Berettas and want to try something different, just because. I've shot the CZ-75 and it left a very pleasant impression, but I've read/heard of issues with the later pistols (Bs) related to the firing pin safeties.

Does anybody have solid experience with them? Anybody here ever use them in a class/competition?

Thanks for any input.

I use mine in competition almost exclusively. There is no issue with the firing pin safety. Not all models even have these safeties - and that is just as it is with the 1911s; the older Colt 1911s (including every one ever issued) did not have such safeties. Only the "Series 80" (post 1980) 1911 guns had them.

Anyway, the 75b, the P-01 and the larger steel SP-01 all come with a firing pin safety. The 85 Combat does not come with one - by design.

For competition, the SP-01 dominates as its a large, heavy, steel framed gun that soaks up recoil and is very very accurate. It also has an 18 round capacity. There are ways to get it into SSP.

For carry, the P-01 is smaller and lighter; somewhat like a Glock 19; and it has an aluminum alloy frame. It comes in 9mm and it very accurate and reliable (it is the new Czech national police sidearm).

The original CZ-75b is in between; steel frame, reliable and accurate. Its design is nearly as copied as the 1911 - including the old US- made Bren 10.

I prefer the SA/DA guns WITHOUT the de-cocker. Also, while the "wonder finish" is strong, its still paint; I prefer the blued models.

[mattjmcd]

I've had a -75B and a P-01. Of the 2, I liked the P-01 better overall.

I had some minor issues with the bigger gun early on, but my local smith fixed it easily. the problem was frequent premature slide lock. It turns out that my gun had a "loose" (for lack of a better word- maybe "incorrectly tuned/tensioned" is better?) slide stop/release. Under recoil it could bounce up into the lock position. Anyway, it was a quick fix and the gun was accurate and GTG from then on.

The P-01 was DA/SA and also very very accurate. As a SoCal, I am limited to 10 rounds, and the P-01 is more size efficient given that kind of restriction. It was absolutely bullet-proof in terms of reliability. It is highly underrated, IMO.

[TOrrock]

I've had CZ's since 1989, before the Wall fell and you really weren't supposed to have them in the US.

They're fantastic pistols, they're "old school" compared to a S&W M&P, but they work beautifully.

I've not heard of any issues with the firing pin lock. Having said that, I'd love to have an original pre-B '75, like I had in 1989 and stupidly sold.

I used a B model in IDPA as Enhanced Service Pistol (cocked n' locked) and made Expert fairly easily with it.

I look at them as a blend of the Hi Power and the SIG, with some original stuff thrown in for good measure.

CZ's are definitely good to go.

[Robb Jensen]

I will never sell my CZ85 Combat.

[9MX]

i've competed for a year with a CZ-85B. Never encountered a firing pin safety issue.

The weaklink of the CZ-75 platforms based on my experience as well as my fellow CZ shooters then is the slide stop. It breaks, mine did after about 5K rounds

[blackscot]

Another fer-definite +1 on the CZ75B ! ! !

I've owned a couple, and like them every bit as much as any 1911. Built like a brick outhouse, and the internal design is actually relatively friendly to ameteur smithing/tuning.

Also used them in competition to great effect. THE platform for IDPA Enhanced Division. Was too heavy for me as an everyday carry piece, but that's just me. Compact models probably better suited there.

Maybe if I ever finish dorking around with all the plastic guns, I'll get me another one of these beauties.

ETA - Would make a great sidekick to that newly acquired SLR-106FR.

[rhino]

I had a CZ-75B for a while. I fired few hundred rounds through it with no malfunctions of any kind (not even any "except for . . ."). I would still own it and use it regularly, but my fingers are just too short to reach the trigger and the thumb safety. They are great guns and a very good value as well.

[Redmanfms]

I had a CZ-75B for a while. I fired few hundred rounds through it with no malfunctions of any kind (not even any "except for . . ."). I would still own it and use it regularly, but my fingers are just too short to reach the trigger and the thumb safety. They are great guns and a very good value as well.

How does the trigger reach compare to a 92FS? I've been relying on the Beretta for many years as it is one of the most accurate pistols I own and has had zero failures over nearly 15,000 rounds, but maintaining a proper grip makes reaching the trigger rather difficult in DA mode (I also hate the safety with a passion). I only fired a magazine or two through the CZ many years ago and remember it being a positive experience, but I really hope reach won't be an issue as I have literally tiny hands, though I suppose I could just carry cocked-and-locked.

[TOrrock]

In DA mode, the trigger is a little further forward than a 92FS....but in SA mode, it's like a Hi Power...