Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Nikon Products

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    East Tennessee
    Posts
    1,225
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    I have it ($279) on my 6721 using the Burris AR-PEPR mount ($74). It has the point-blank reticule.. The Burris mount is slick as well..Ron

    http://www.burrisoptics.com/arpepr.html



    Last edited by Kokopelli; 02-02-12 at 12:10.
    Ain't no pockets on a shroud..

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NWA.
    Posts
    165
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I have a M-223 that for the most part, has worked out pretty well. I don't put heavy use on it, but it worked great for 2 days in the rain at an Appleseed shoot. It held a good Zero, did not fog up, even being left out in the rain and mud. Now the flip up lense caps that come with it flat out suck, but for the $$, I would buy another...



    Notice lack of rear cap......

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    East Tennessee
    Posts
    1,225
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    I ditched the flip-ups as well. I use a Butler Creek Bikini cover. It suits my style of shooting for this rifle.. Cheers.. Ron
    Ain't no pockets on a shroud..

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    VA/NC/Kuwait
    Posts
    46
    Feedback Score
    0

    Nikon

    Good-
    I think Nikon has really good glass for the money.
    Bad-
    I usually hate the reticles Nikon uses. Even when they do use a decent reticle, I usually do not like the turrets.

    I really think there is the potential for them to be making really good, affordable gear, but for whatever reason, I don't think they "get it" most of the time.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    East Tennessee
    Posts
    1,225
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    I like the point-blank reticule and the turrets as well, however they are more suited to target/plinking (my intended use) than tactical use. Very easy to use with positive 1/4 MOA clicks.. Ron
    Last edited by Kokopelli; 02-02-12 at 13:01.
    Ain't no pockets on a shroud..

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    South of Canada
    Posts
    399
    Feedback Score
    0
    That's what made me unsure about getting one for testing since the Nikon site recommends them for hunting.
    Last edited by Hwikek; 02-11-12 at 13:52.
    Yes, I like pretty ponies.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    East Tennessee
    Posts
    1,225
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Hwikek View Post
    That's what made me unsure about getting one for testing since the Nikon sight recommends them for hunting.
    You can see what I mean by looking at my pics. Nice big easy to use turrets and focus adjustment, but no lock-downs.. Not a problem for me, but I ain't clearing buildings.. That's really the only reason I said what I did about that.. Cheers.. Ron
    Ain't no pockets on a shroud..

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    466
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    If Nikon wanted to "get with the program", they could crank out something fantastic. I just don't think they're too interested in their sports optics division. Their pro SLR bodies and lenses show they've got the optics and ruggedness down. Those go through more abuse than a rifle scope and the optics are much more critical.
    “The practical success of an idea, irrespective of its inherent merit, is dependent on the attitude of the contemporaries." Nikola Tesla

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •