Page 1 of 15 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 143

Thread: Midwest Industries Inc. Gen 2 SS Free Float Handguards

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Waukesha WI
    Posts
    740
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)

    Midwest Industries Inc. Gen 2 SS Free Float Handguards

    Midwest Industries Inc. is proud to release the NEW GEN 2 SS HANDGUARDS





    PETE
    MI

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    3,799
    Feedback Score
    19 (100%)
    Quick thoughts:

    -the quoted weights are great.

    -including a bipod stud and a QD cup in one of the included rail sections is a BIG plus compared to other brands where you need to spend a lot extra for those.

    -is the barrel nut the same as a GI barrel nut or proprietary?

    -I find it funny that MI is going to a clamping style attachment like a Troy TRX (original) just as Troy is switching away from that design. Any comments on that?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    10,039
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SomeOtherGuy View Post
    Q

    -I find it funny that MI is going to a clamping style attachment like a Troy TRX (original) just as Troy is switching away from that design. Any comments on that?
    I don't hold Troy as a standard, do you?
    Stick


    Board policy mandates I state that I shoot for BCM. I have also done work for 200 or so manufacturers within the firearm community. I am prior service, a full time LEO, firearm instructor, armorer, TL, martial arts instructor, and all around good guy.

    I also shoot and write for various publications. Let me know if you know cool secrets or have toys worthy of an article...


    Flickr Tumblr Facebook Instagram RECOILMAGAZINE OFF GRID RECOIL WEB

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    3,799
    Feedback Score
    19 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Stickman View Post
    I don't hold Troy as a standard, do you?
    Not as a standard, but it is interesting to see one company adopt a relatively unusual way of doing something just as what I think the first company to use that method goes away from it. It appears that Troy changed their attachment design due to perceived or possibly real issues with the strength of that attachment. MI may have done something different that has no issues, but I am curious to learn more.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    637
    Feedback Score
    0
    It looks like a proprietary barrel nut. The teeth of the nut appear to go up against the upper with the long smooth section pointing towards the muzzle. The teeth may be exposed, slightly, as the four locking tabs on the forend engage the teeth to prevent it from rotating. At least that is what it looks like from the photos.

    It looks interesting. I have another build and will consider this rail.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    637
    Feedback Score
    0
    They were not the first to use the slit/screw clamping method. Google the Olympic Arms Firsh handguard. The difference is that the Firsh threaded on the barrel nut and then used one screw/later two screws to clamp to the barrel nut instead of using a jam nut to keep it alive.

    I am not certain the Olympic Arms Firsh was the first, but I installed one about 20 years ago and it is still being used. (it is a heavy rail and outdated in my opinion, but not because of the screw clamp) Also this method has been used in other applications with great success. It all depends on the amount of bearing surface it clamps against.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    460
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    The Firsh was a boat anchor with rails on it. I've never used a troy. Does it lock into the barrel nut, or is it completely friction fit?

    So are there inserts to the SS, or do the rails screw directly into the tube? Are there going to be other rail lengths available for the system, or can existing MI rail segments be used?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    3,799
    Feedback Score
    19 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by thei3ug View Post
    The Firsh was a boat anchor with rails on it. I've never used a troy. Does it lock into the barrel nut, or is it completely friction fit?
    The Troy TRX design has a barrel nut that is similar to a GI but slightly smaller. The handguard has longitudinal grooves. You slip the grooves over the spikes on the nut and then rotate very slightly (maybe 10 degrees) to align the handguard with receiver, which causes the nut spikes to sit within a circumferential groove that keeps the handguard from moving forward or backward. Then you tighten a slit-clamp for a friction fit to keep it in place. It works fine and many people have abused TRX / TRX Extreme handguards with no issues, but a few report issues and many have questioned its strength.

    I think az doug is right about the barrel nut and how this would work. I am wondering if the only thing keeping it from sliding forward is friction from the clamp, or if there is some mechanical stop as well.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    4,229
    Feedback Score
    21 (100%)
    After I tried and broke my Troy, I went to the Centurion Arms rails. In my opinion, the two clamping screws need to have replaceable STEEL nuts instead of the embedded helicoils. The tab could have a hexagonal cut out to hold the steel nuts semi"captive". What I seriously think is lacking on a lot of items are torque specs. I mean, if you make the dang thing and the nut it clamps to, shouldn't you know how tight it should be within a safe range vs. finger tight or small gap, etc. etc.
    GET IN YOUR BUBBLE!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    10,039
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SomeOtherGuy View Post
    Not as a standard, but it is interesting to see one company adopt a relatively unusual way of doing something just as what I think the first company to use that method goes away from it. It appears that Troy changed their attachment design due to perceived or possibly real issues with the strength of that attachment. MI may have done something different that has no issues, but I am curious to learn more.

    Troy wasn't the first company.
    Stick


    Board policy mandates I state that I shoot for BCM. I have also done work for 200 or so manufacturers within the firearm community. I am prior service, a full time LEO, firearm instructor, armorer, TL, martial arts instructor, and all around good guy.

    I also shoot and write for various publications. Let me know if you know cool secrets or have toys worthy of an article...


    Flickr Tumblr Facebook Instagram RECOILMAGAZINE OFF GRID RECOIL WEB

Page 1 of 15 12311 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •