Page 1 of 46 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 451

Thread: Recent manufacture M&P 9 accuracy

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    616
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)

    Recent manufacture M&P 9 accuracy

    Due to some unusual circumstances, I ended up doing a first firing of seven recent manufacture M&P 9mm pistols today. They were 2 Pro's, 2 FS with TS, 2 FS w/out FS, and 1 compact with TS. Given reports of inconsistent accuracy with the 9 mm M&P's, I decided to shoot groups with each pistol at 25 yards on a PistolTraining.com target, as it is conducive to shooting groups. My position was sitting, which is stable for me, and I shot two five round groups with each pistol using WWB ammo. For a control, I shot a known accurate M&P 9 FS, and some other pistols.

    1) M&P 9 FS, no TS, DCAEK trigger, HD sights. 8 inch group, as well centered as an 8 inch group can be, repeated twice. At that point, I started doubting my trigger control this morning, and shot a Glock 19 with HD sights I had with me. Shot two sub 3 inch groups with the 19 and HD sights. Followed up with old M&P 9 and shot two sub 3.5 inch groups.

    2) M&P 9 FS, TS, stock sights and trigger. Both groups were 3.5 inches or better.

    3) M&P 9 FS, TS, stock sights and trigger. Both groups were 3.5 inches or better.

    4) M&P Pro. Both groups were larger than 6 inches.

    5) M&P Pro. Both groups were 3.5 inches or better.

    6) M&P 9 C, TS, stock sights and trigger. Group was 6 inches or larger. Elevation was good, dispersion was all in windage. Took another 9C upper I had, put it on the lower, and shot two groups 3.5 inches or smaller.

    7) M&P 9 FS, no TS. Both groups were about six inches.

    For control, I shot some other pistols and to verify some sights. G17 w/RMR 5 shot group well inside two inch PT dot. M&P 45 mid-size w/RMR, 230 HST, group right around 2.5 inches. G34 FO sights, 2 inch group. G26 group smaller than 3.5 inches.

    Amazingly, the G26 with HD sights shot as well as the best new M&P pistol. While undoubtedly, my sitting groups were larger than shot from a bench, 4 out of 7 new M&P 9mm pistols were flat out unusable by my accuracy standards. Not sure what S&W will do when I box the four pistols up and send them back, but they need to be a lot more accurate or go away.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    North Georgia
    Posts
    1,691
    Feedback Score
    0
    My Pro 9 was a 5-6" gun. I'd have kept it if it would have shown me 3.5". It wouldn't have had to shoot groups like the one in my avatar.
    "Whatever it's for; it wasn't possible until now!!!" - KrampusArms

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    DIXIE
    Posts
    442
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Guess I got lucky...my new M&P9 shoots just fine...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    514
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I have become much more fond of my 45 Midsize and Compact over my 9MM Fullsize and Compact due to their accuracy.

    After taking all four to the range today and yesterday, I may pick up a H&K P30 9MM to tide me over until the Bar-Sto barrels are ready.
    That, or, just shoot the 45s for awhile.

    I knew prior to purchasing my M&Ps that by not waiting until Smith gets the bugs out of these guns, I would have to pony-up a bunch of extra cash to get them the way that I want them. I'm guess 1911s have made me immune to crying about dumping money into guns...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    KC
    Posts
    454
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    This whole phenomenon has really bugged me lately. I sold off most of my random handguns with the goal of standardizing on one 9mm platform.

    It came down between S&W M&P, Glock 3rd Gen, and Hk's P30 line. After owning and shooting all of these at one point or another...I decided the M&P would suite me best because of it's features and low cost.

    Well now it looks like the M&P's will end up costing the same as the damn Hk's. Looks like it's gonna be between the Hk and Glock again.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    514
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by MikeCLeonard View Post
    This whole phenomenon has really bugged me lately. I sold off most of my random handguns with the goal of standardizing on one 9mm platform.

    It came down between S&W M&P, Glock 3rd Gen, and Hk's P30 line. After owning and shooting all of these at one point or another...I decided the M&P would suite me best because of it's features and low cost.

    Well now it looks like the M&P's will end up costing the same as the damn Hk's. Looks like it's gonna be between the Hk and Glock again.
    I'm in the same boat as you except that I plan to keep some .45s.
    I was avoiding the high cost of H&Ks plus their magazines by going with the M&Ps but it is a wash now. The good thing is that the Bar-Sto barrel should make the M&P 9MM a great gun and I know that H&Ks work well for me. It's long road, isn't it?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    KC
    Posts
    454
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Yeah, it's proving to be a difficult decision! Over the Hk, I like that the M&P has the Crimson Trace laser grip option, better parts availability, threaded barrel options, and a sub-compact version that can use the same holster as the full-size.

    I could just take the chance with S&W, and if it shoots well, then awesome...and if it doesn't, I could get the Apex barrel and get great accuracy...but the whole thing is just leaving a bad taste in my mouth and makes me concerned about Smith & Wesson's quality control in general. I feel like I would have trouble trusting the gun over the long haul.

    The same thing kinda goes for Glock at the moment...even though I would get a Gen 3 over the Gen 4...I'm a bit put-off by their recent ability to take one of the most highly trusted designs in the handgun world and make it suck ass.

    I realize nothing man-made is infallible, and every manufacturer slips up and lets some turds fly...but I won't purchase their stuff if they don't seem to care about cleaning up their mess.

    BTW, thanks for posting these results GJM!
    Last edited by MikeCLeonard; 01-26-12 at 22:04.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,631
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Interesting test and about as I expected.

    One thing to try though is shoot the guns with a +P load (especially a 124gr-147gr + P) and see what you get.




    C4
    Last edited by C4IGrant; 01-27-12 at 09:02.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,921
    Feedback Score
    15 (100%)
    As you're sending four guns back to Smith & Wesson, I'd be very interested in what becomes of this. Especially if they do any work to the guns and you repeat the same test with the same guns after they are returned.

    Please keep us updated on the results of your four guns.
    Last edited by Beat Trash; 01-26-12 at 22:48.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    51
    Feedback Score
    0
    GJM, thank you very much for posting this information. I look forward to your results with other ammunition and most of all, the results after S&W returns the pistols to you.

    I really hope the 4 pistols are returned to you with acceptable accuracy. I've been planning to standardize on one 9mm platform for a while and want it to be the M&P. The results of S&W's warranty work here will greatly influence my decision.
    Last edited by LorenzoS; 01-27-12 at 10:01.

Page 1 of 46 12311 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •