Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst ... 6789 LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 83

Thread: 90 something tooth AAC mount?

  1. #71
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    KY
    Posts
    91
    Feedback Score
    0
    Well if the government ever lets me have my m4-2000 ill let you know if it wobles

    Finger print cards got kicked back 3 weeks ago and I'm still waiting for them toaccept the new ones I've sent them

    Been pending since 8/18. This wait is stupid

  2. #72
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    WY
    Posts
    887
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    One thing is for certain, I know Dano has used the AAC cans every bit as much as he says. I can't imagine anyone else has put them to the amount of use/abuse his guys do.

    It's one thing to disagree, without going full retard. Its one thing to have a lot of guns at home, it's another to have spent a long career employing those systems in combat conditions. I'd say calling the guy a liar because he views the issue differently is way out of line.

  3. #73
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,397
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Eurodriver View Post

    A year from now, everyone will be mad with the SR5/SR7 and people will be saying "Get the XXX that AAC just released at SHOT"

    ...this happens every year yet people refuse to learn.
    You do know the current M4-2000 was released in like 2008 right? They used to call it a Mod '08. I'd be so extremely skeptical of an SR5.2 or SR7.2 for next shot.

    There is some serious BS going in this thread. If you don't like AAC, buy a Surefire and pay a lot more for it. Or buy a YHM and pay less, but get less.

    Imo, if you have a lot of 51T mounts and cans, stay with that! The newest silencerco products will mate up, you might be able to get cheaper 51T cans now, and it does look like AAC is still supporting it seeing as the new Mini7 is not 90T it's 51T.

    If you don't own anything AAC, might as well start with the 90T. This seems pretty logical and I'm not sure where all the drama is coming from.

  4. #74
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    90
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mikey View Post
    Look in front of the teeth. That is a tapered bearing surface. That is what promotes better lock up. Its not just finer teeth.
    YHM mounts use a similar tapered surface and are the worst mounts made for getting stuck to the can after lots of shooting.

  5. #75
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    90
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Dano5326 View Post
    I've never seen anywhere near those rd counts possible on SS cans, which show erosion much faster, nor an AR that can do that kind of rd count with a can... gas port eroded beyond belief & smoothbore at this point?

    Of course this is the internet & physics don't apply.. One gets MUCH faster degradation of barrel life, gas port and baffles with Auto and high rd count.
    I've seen two other posts claiming 15,000 rounds or more through a phantom 556 that is still in good shape.

  6. #76
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,503
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Schulze View Post
    I've seen two other posts claiming 15,000 rounds or more through a phantom 556 that is still in good shape.
    15K rounds = $5K in ammo. I think even after that a new suppressor is not that expensive considering.

  7. #77
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    600
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Javelin View Post
    15K rounds = $5K in ammo. I think even after that a new suppressor is not that expensive considering.
    Except I'm buying components at OEM pricing and loading my own ammunition, so it's only $123 per thousand.
    I'm an FFL/gunsmith, not the holster company. We specialize in subsonic ammunition and wholesale rifles.

  8. #78
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    KY
    Posts
    91
    Feedback Score
    0
    My m4-2000 wobbled rotationally at first

    Couple hundred rounds later its tight. I dont know if it finally clicked over or if carbon has just built up.

    Im happy with it


  9. #79
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    10
    Feedback Score
    0
    I too am waiting on my 762sdn6 and have two 51t mounts for a black and a 5.56. I will be very "disappointed" if my 1400 dollars worth or can, mounts, and stamp don't combine to make awesomeness.

    Kidding aside, if the sloppy fit is a known issue and it is linked to damaged parts, maybe a class action lawsuit could be a remedy?

  10. #80
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,503
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Raven Armament View Post
    Except I'm buying components at OEM pricing and loading my own ammunition, so it's only $123 per thousand.
    Nobody likes a bragger Raven.

Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst ... 6789 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •