Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 281

Thread: AR- Piston or Direct Impingement?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    8,799
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)

    AR- Piston or Direct Impingement?

    The question still comes up and the debate rages on- “Should I Get a Piston for my AR or Direct Impingement?” The answer is, the AR already has a piston and none use a direct impingement system.

    First, let's take a look at a conventional Direct Impingement system. The key feature is that gases act directly on carrier. The gas travels through a gas tube to act directly on the carrier. The following diagrams show the DI system of the Ljungman Ag m/42.



    Eugene Stoner said in the original patent for his gas sytem “This invention is a true expanding gas system instead of the conventional impinging gas system.” The gases enter the expansion chamber inside the bolt carrier and drives the carrier rearward. The piston is actually the tail piece of the bolt. The rearward motion continues, unlocking the bolt and extracting the spent case.

    The system is designed to be self regulating. When enough pressure enters to operate the action and the carrier begins to move, the key separates from the tube and cuts off the gas flow to the carrier. There are also vents in the carrier to allow the gases to escape and the pressure to drop inside the cylinder when the piston seals move past them. After that, the action is powered by momentum and returned into position by the energy stored in the action spring.

    In the AR system, Eugene Stoner eliminated the actuator rod of other piston gas systems and incorporates the piston with the bolt and the cylinder with the bolt carrier to “...provide smoother operation and longer life of the working parts...” The patent goes on to explain that since all the actuating force is inline with the bore and bolt to the shooter's shoulder “all of the off center loads found in most other types of gas actuated weapons are eliminated” to cut down on “climb” during automatic fire.

    The so-called “piston upper” (ie- Adams, HK416, LWRC etc.,) does not convert an AR from direct impingement system to a piston system. It converts the AR from an inline piston system to an offset piston system and adds an actuator rod.

    Anyone tells you your AR needs a piston to run cleaner/cooler/tacticooler, tell them

    "No thank you. My AR already has a piston"

    Stoner Patent #2,951,424: http://www.google.com/patents?id=ETJ...page&q&f=false

    Note: I will edit this post as my research continues, to correct any mistakes and for clarity
    Last edited by MistWolf; 01-08-14 at 15:49.
    The number of folks on my Full Of Shit list grows everyday

    http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n289/SgtSongDog/AR%20Carbine/DSC_0114.jpg
    I am American

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    3,095
    Feedback Score
    7 (89%)
    excellent write up

    i gotta say stoner was a genius, its no wonder his system is still in use today as one of the best rifles in the world
    Last edited by sinlessorrow; 02-12-12 at 00:07.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    out west
    Posts
    700
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Well said. I hope this gets stickied.
    "Oh, its a wonderful day! My sun is shining, my birds are chirping, my humongous chicken defeated Elmo." Huxley

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    15
    Feedback Score
    0
    Awesome explanation. That puts things into perspective.

    Sent from my A500 using Tapatalk

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    847
    Feedback Score
    15 (100%)
    CAN WE GET A HALLELUJAH!

    Right on. Excellent write up. Thanks.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    46
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Excellent explanation of the inner workings. Hard for detractors to argue with what Stoner wrote in the patent paperwork........

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Oregon Coast
    Posts
    416
    Feedback Score
    0
    It's always nice to pick up more info on the firearm we love so much, great write-up. Strap up for all the naysayers' comments...they're sure to come.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    North Florida
    Posts
    2,683
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I've always thought the name "Direct Impingement" was unfortunate. A more descriptive name would contain the word "coaxial" as this is the feature that truly distinguishes this system from all the others. Perhaps "coaxial piston" or "coaxial system" or some such. It is indeed true that all ARs, indeed, all centerfire auto rifles except the handful of recoil operated systems, are piston systems.
    Last edited by Suwannee Tim; 02-13-12 at 12:17.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    14
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Heavy Metal View Post
    AL is a far better heat sink. The choice of Aluminum for a upper reciever material is a far superior choice than steel. Aluminum can reject heat far more quickly and the AL upper helps remove excess heat from the chamber area.
    Aluminum absorbs and dissipates heat faster. I think you two just aren't on the same terminology.

    Sent from my MB860

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,352
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Water in the gas tube probably doesn't come up much because its really a non issue since 99% of folks don't spend any time in the water with their rifles. And those that do know that a simple tilt and shake should limit any issues related to water in their gas tubes.

    Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk
    Last edited by wahoo95; 03-21-12 at 07:58.

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •