Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Rem 700 sps tactical dbm question...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2
    Feedback Score
    0

    Rem 700 sps tactical dbm question...

    Ive got a Rem 700 sps tactical and i was curious if anyone has tried to install this http://www.stockysstocks.com/servlet...agazine/Detail into the factory hogue stock without any kind of major fitting.

    If anyone has the hogue stock and a DM set up, any information on the subject would be appreciated. I really don't want to replace the stock if i do not need to in order to run a box mag. Thanks for any help on the topic.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    166
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Badbrad700 View Post
    Ive got a Rem 700 sps tactical and i was curious if anyone has tried to install this http://www.stockysstocks.com/servlet...agazine/Detail into the factory hogue stock without any kind of major fitting.

    If anyone has the hogue stock and a DM set up, any information on the subject would be appreciated. I really don't want to replace the stock if i do not need to in order to run a box mag. Thanks for any help on the topic.

    Upgrade the stock before you get detachable bottom metal. The hogue stock is junk.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    1,217
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    I'm embarking on a .308 700 SPS Tac build too. The Hogue will be replaced with a B&C Medalist 2958 before I fire the first round through it (I prefer the more traditional varmint-style stock). Maybe there's a Manners or McMillan in the future, I'll see how the project goes.

    Looks like I'll be going with the SWFA SS HD 10x42 in Leupold Mk 4 rings/1-piece base. I plan on bedding the base to the receiver since I'm hearing that will probably be needed.

    For loads, I'll be working mostly with Sierra 168 MKs. In a Rem 700RS in .30-'06 I once had (22" sporter weight barrell), it shot 150 grain Nosler ballistic tips into clover leaf groups - I may give the 165 BTs a try.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    N.E. Ohio
    Posts
    229
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    I've got a ghillie green Hogue stock that I'll send you to putz with if you like. I wouldn't sell this thing to anyone. I tried to reinforce the fore end with square steel tubing and Alumalite; but alas, it's still a P.O.S.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    72
    Feedback Score
    0
    Most generally, yes there will be some fitting. As to how much, I can't tell you that. Each one is a little different.

    Kind of a rule of thumb to follow when a facility tells you its drop in, always expect to have to fit it to some degree and if it actually does drop in then that is a plus.
    Last edited by The Surgeon; 02-16-12 at 17:37.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    20
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Canonshooter View Post
    I'm embarking on a .308 700 SPS Tac build too. The Hogue will be replaced with a B&C Medalist 2958 before I fire the first round through it (I prefer the more traditional varmint-style stock). Maybe there's a Manners or McMillan in the future, I'll see how the project goes.

    Looks like I'll be going with the SWFA SS HD 10x42 in Leupold Mk 4 rings/1-piece base. I plan on bedding the base to the receiver since I'm hearing that will probably be needed.

    For loads, I'll be working mostly with Sierra 168 MKs. In a Rem 700RS in .30-'06 I once had (22" sporter weight barrell), it shot 150 grain Nosler ballistic tips into clover leaf groups - I may give the 165 BTs a try.
    I went with the b&c M40 stock because it has the aluminum chassis all the way to the front swivel, the 2958 just has bedding blocks, and wont be as stiff. just something to think about.-J

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    southern us
    Posts
    48
    Feedback Score
    0
    lose the hogue stock if at all possible and stockysstocks.com you mentioned is a great place to find one. the hogue has to much flex and to test it run it from a bipod on a hard surface to forearm on a bag (or just move it with fingertip pressure as mine did ). i chose a bell and carlson with aluminum block bedding and a hook style stock. you did great in choosing the rifle, mine loves hornady 150 sst
    Last edited by S.E.R.T.; 02-21-12 at 05:23.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    USA! USA! USA!
    Posts
    1,200
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by BBJones13 View Post
    Upgrade the stock before you get detachable bottom metal. The hogue stock is junk.
    This. Bottom metal is definitely important, but a new B&C or something along those lines should be your next buy.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    1,217
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by mk262 View Post
    I went with the b&c M40 stock because it has the aluminum chassis all the way to the front swivel, the 2958 just has bedding blocks, and wont be as stiff. just something to think about.-J
    Incorrect - the 2958 has the full AL chassis just like the M40. When I pull the front stud out, it's a machine thread going into a pretty thick piece of AL embedded in the stock.

    Like the m40 model, the 2958 is part of the B&C Medalist line that uses the full aluminum skeleton. Here is B&C's catalog, the stocks we're discussing are on page 6;

    http://www.bellandcarlson.com/bc_cat09%20(1).pdf
    Last edited by Canonshooter; 02-21-12 at 15:56.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    20
    Feedback Score
    0
    I stand corrected! I had judged by the stockys stocks website that model didnt come with the aluminum skeleton-J

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •