Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 41 to 50 of 50

Thread: S&W going no-lock?

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    OH
    Posts
    2,852
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by mdauben View Post
    I'd love to see them drop the locks. It certainly seem that no one actually likes them. I just wonder if they would be willing to face the potential liability issue of removing a "safety feature" from their products.
    The liability argument is meaningless. S&W already makes a shitload of handguns, including revolvers, without locks.

    Think about it. Hard.

    I cannot fathom one good reason why S&W insists on that retarded feature as standard on some guns and not on others.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    138
    Feedback Score
    0
    As soon as they drop the locks, many people will be picking up .357 and .44 classic revolvers.

    Hell, I'll get a Dirty Harry Model 29 if they drop the lock on new production.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,574
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by kantstudien View Post
    As soon as they drop the locks, many people will be picking up .357 and .44 classic revolvers.

    Hell, I'll get a Dirty Harry Model 29 if they drop the lock on new production.
    I wouldn't hold your breath.

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    southern US
    Posts
    1,519
    Feedback Score
    0
    The plus side is S&W is saving me a bunch of money by continuing to produce their lock version.

  5. #45
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,574
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by brushy bill View Post
    The plus side is S&W is saving me a bunch of money by continuing to produce their lock version.
    Not me. I've spent a bunch buying old ones.

  6. #46
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    124
    Feedback Score
    15 (100%)
    I dont think the lock will ever go away the most we can hope for is it becomes an option. I wish Smith would go back to making revos with hammer mounted firing pins too

  7. #47
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    2
    Feedback Score
    0
    close to 1k rounds with my 686 and no lock issues, but with my luck, it'll lock up when i really do need it

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    OH
    Posts
    2,852
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by DucQ View Post
    close to 1k rounds with my 686 and no lock issues, but with my luck, it'll lock up when i really do need it
    Take the flag out then.

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    16
    Feedback Score
    0
    From what I can tell, they are only offering no-locks in double-action-only guns. I also think I remember them offering one with a bobbed hammer a little while back which also had no lock. If they would get rid of the locks, I would buy 5 new revolvers in the first week. I would even be satisfied with several models if they bobbed the hammers.

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    southern US
    Posts
    1,519
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by greenlion View Post
    From what I can tell, they are only offering no-locks in double-action-only guns. I also think I remember them offering one with a bobbed hammer a little while back which also had no lock. If they would get rid of the locks, I would buy 5 new revolvers in the first week. I would even be satisfied with several models if they bobbed the hammers.
    You're not alone, but apparently they are making/selling enough revolvers that they really don't want to sell X number of times more.
    Last edited by brushy bill; 05-27-13 at 14:15.

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •