I just discovered a second AR in .300 Win Mag. I can't afford either of these rifles. I love the technology though, and I'm fascinated by how they work. What I want to learn how to do is not only appreciate them from the sidelines, but also figure out which rifle is superior. How can I tell, just from specs or website information, which rifle is more accurate or reliable? Is that even remotely possible?

Which company has made a better .300 Win Mag AR?
Which one would you rather shoot? If you've shot either one, please share!

The NEMO Omen // Match
.300 Win Mag AR: http://nemoarms.com/portfolio/omen-m.../gallery/guns/

The Noreen Bad News .338 Lapua (AND .300 Win Mag) ULR: http://www.onlylongrange.com/badnews.asp

The Omen weighs 9.2, while the Bad News weighs 13 pounds. I'd say the Omen has the advantage there. However, the Bad News has a 26" barrel, which is 4" longer than the Omen. But as for the internals and small parts, I'm clueless when it comes to comparing them. The Omen has a 7075 Aluminum Billet Matched Receiver Set, while the Bad News's receiver is machined from a billet of 6061 T6 aluminum. What does that even mean?

What are the differences??