Quote Originally Posted by ashooter View Post
Thank you, TheJRK.

All of that makes sense. I hadn't really considered the fact that the "bad guys" would be likely to get detected by the "good guys" even if they had port access and tech support from somebody like Iran or NK, or even PRC. I will sleep a little easier tonight.
Makes sense hunh? Now read this..http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1656/2

This is a response by Dr.'s Pry & Radasky (Members EMP Commission) to Dr. Butt' article entitled
The EMP threat: fact, fiction, and response (part 1)
by Yousaf M. Butt

I've linked to page 2 of the article which explains why shipborne "annonymous" EMP attack is THE most likely scenario and why.

If you want to read Dr Butt's article here it is http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1549/1

It's not a contest of who's dick is bigger between me and TRK. I give you documentation, facts and articles from the experts, he, an anonymous Internet poster gives his opinion without validating his credentials other than " I worked in missile defense for 15 years". Note...he still has not stated what capacity he worked in. You're free to accept whatever or who's thought processes you want.