Originally Posted by
pointblank4445
Yeah, somehow I doubt that last part...
The margins for terminal performance are not that wide as you say and as distance increases, the margins narrow further. I can think of one exception of a wide variance in weight retention but it's with a company known for questionable data and it's a bullet that shouldn't be used for terminal effect in the first place.
The answer is push the better bullet. The first problem is always connecting to the target. A miss with a marginally terminally better projectile is a terminal effect of ZERO. And even with 308 bullet selection is critical and the better performing rounds are at the expense of external performance. If you're doing an apples-to-apples say in a TTSX Barnes, one still gets more forgiveness with their shooting solution. I'll happily take a better BC for the money any day.
Also what's the context?
We talking humane precision hunting/animal harvesting
Military?
LE?
(all rhetorical)
Bookmarks