Other than them thinking it would make the handguard less strong and rigid, what other reason could there be. Why did Hodge Defense do something similar with their Wedgelock handguard ?
IMHO, other than them looking retro and dated and lacking the sex appeal that many think a continous top rail has, I don't think you can beat them for the price. Also, I ran a CNC mill for many years machining all kinds of aluminum parts, and the time to machine in all the M-LOK slots the full length on their *longest* handguard would probably add less than 10 minutes of machining time. Also, if you use the right tooling and feeds and speeds on 6061 aluminum. your tooling will last a long time before it needs changed.
Last edited by Biggy; 02-19-19 at 13:23.
Just off the cuff I would say for two reasons. First, is that many people don't mount things on those portions of the rail. This then allows for the second reason which is that M-Lok slots have to be machined to a specific dimension, while a "miscellaneous cut" does not. That would translate into less QA and lower cost.
Love it except the attachment method. I mean it’s solid but not aesthetically pleasing.
Anyone have weights on these?
“God doesn’t need your good works, but your neighbor does.” - Luther
Originally Posted by 1168
I’m no Larue fan but you have to give Mark credit. He’s changing with the market to keep the machines running. Larue UU kits; roughly $1100 for a small frame including lower, roughly $1500 for a large frame with the lower, MBT $87, now these rails.
“I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.” – Thomas Jefferson.
He has the means to bury the competition whom he regards as having wronged him, and he's been executing these steps. I would not want to be on his bad side
Last edited by Duffy; 02-19-19 at 21:15.
Roger Wang
Forward Controls Design
Simplicity is the sign of truth
Bookmarks