POW-MIA, #22untilnone
Let Us #NeverForget!
If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong.
The last thing I want to do is hurt you,
but it's still on my list.
Yes, same plate I used. I shot 250rds last night and no issues.
This is my first red dot pistol, but I am here to stay.
That dot is such a fine aiming point, and better than a front sight post.
While zeroing at 25yds I was happy to see a very nice tight group, and it took minimal adjustment, like 3-4 clicks right and I was done.
Everything remained tight, time and more rounds will tell though.
That C&H plate would be awesome if it was made of steel and not aluminum. Aluminum isn’t a very good material for that application.
The stock MOS plate is certainly not the better option. If C&H was using balsa wood it would probably still be better.
RLTW
“What’s New” button, but without GD: https://www.m4carbine.net/search.php...new&exclude=60 , courtesy of ST911.
Disclosure: I am affiliated PRN with a tactical training center, but I speak only for myself. I have no idea what we sell, other than CLP and training. I receive no income from sale of hard goods.
The stock isn’t designed better but the material is better. Someone really needs to develop a plate just like C&H’s but use billet steel. I can’t believe someone hasn’t yet. I’ll keep using the stock plate until then. Haven’t had any issues with my gen 5 34 with over 4000 through it with the stock plate.
Bookmarks