- Will
General Performance/Fitness Advice for all
www.BrinkZone.com
LE/Mil specific info:
https://brinkzone.com/category/swatleomilitary/
“Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”
The biggest difference that I can think of between the STI and the EDC X9 is that there are multiple vendors/manufacturers of STI magazines and they can be had in capacities up to 29 or 30 rounds, while the EDC X9 tops out at 18. Plus, if STI goes out of business tomorrow, there will still be plenty of magazines and spare parts out there for their 2011s. If Wilson suddenly folded up shop, nobody's making spare parts or accessories for the EDC X9.
The other difference is who the guns are marketed to: The EDC X9 is marketed to private individuals who like high-end 1911s (but want the capacity of a G19), while the STI is marketed toward LE agencies that like 1911s (but want the capacity of a G17/34).
" Nil desperandum - Never Despair. That is a motto for you and me. All are not dead; and where there is a spark of patriotic fire, we will rekindle it. "
- Samuel Adams -
Will,
Actually Hilton ordered his Staccato P off of Gunbroker and has a Staccato P DUO on order from STI. He isn't part of TeamSTI and isn't getting them for T&E. He is paying out of pocket for them both.
If I reading all this correctly there is still the issue of weight. The EDC is lighter.
Personally I want a gun as light as possible. Currently carry a Colt CCO or a 19 and those are my limit.
Taking Hilton's December 1911 class so I hope to get my hands on his personal STI :-).
- Will
General Performance/Fitness Advice for all
www.BrinkZone.com
LE/Mil specific info:
https://brinkzone.com/category/swatleomilitary/
“Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”
And that's why the P isn't a good comparison to the EDC. It really is a full size Duty style weapon due to the longer grip. For a CCW, the DVC-C is a much better option. Both around $3000. I think the Wilson looks better.
DVC-C
Barrel - 3.90 inch Bull Barrel
Finish - Diamond Like Carbon - Black
Magazines - 3x 120mm (16 round capacity flush fit)
Dawson Precision Perfect Impact Sights
Front - Fiber Optic
Rear - Black, Novak cut
Trigger - 4.5 lbs w/ Ambi Thumb Safety
Grip - 2011® DVC Stipple, VIP Length, Black
Other - Recoil Master, Railed Aluminum Frame
Available Calibers - 9mm
Length 7.57 x Grip Width 1.33 x Height 5.12 - Width at Safeties 1.49
Weight - 25.9 oz
Wilson EDC
Available Calibers: 9mm
Magazine Capacity: 15 or 18 rounds
Barrel Length: 4”
Overall Length: 7.4”
Sight Radius: 5.6”
Height: 5.25”
Width: 1.4”
Weight Empty: 29.09 oz
Weight Loaded: 35.04 oz
Last edited by Dump1567; 09-18-19 at 13:35.
I tend to agree that the Wilson would be a better CCW than the P, and vice versa for duty. That said I don't see enough gain over a G19 to get the EDC (though I'd do it if I had an extra $3K laying around). I'm actively working out how to fund a P Duo though.
What if this whole crusade's a charade?
And behind it all there's a price to be paid
For the blood which we dine
Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…
- Will
General Performance/Fitness Advice for all
www.BrinkZone.com
LE/Mil specific info:
https://brinkzone.com/category/swatleomilitary/
“Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”
I like that Wilson deleted the grip safety but imo those guns aesthetically look atrocious.
And being 1911s looks matter
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm concerned about the jump the shorter factory 9MM loads have to make in a magazine designed to feed longer .45ACP and 38Super ammo. In the Wilson the magazine was designed for the 9MM and would seem to be more reliable if everything else equal.
Bookmarks