|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Member
https://www.shootingillustrated.com/...-lcp-ii-22-lr/
https://ruger.com/micros/liteRack/
No too big a surpise I suppose. Companies have been making trainer versions of their full size guns for years.
Interesting coming on the heels of the Glock 44. Different guns but same concept.
Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
“The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles."
Senior Member
It will sell by many thousands.
It won't be super reliable because it's a. 22lr.
If it was .32 or .25 I'd probably buy one.
Member
Sportsman's outdoor superstore has them for sale as a "pre order" for $309.99.
https://www.sportsmansoutdoorsuperst...paign=123019-1
Senior Member
Interesting. Glad to Ruger innovating. Wish they had an option for no external safety like the LCP 380. Am I crazy for thinking they should also offer a threaded barrel option?
Politician's Prefer Unarmed Peasants
Senior Member
I assume a threaded barrel will be an option at some point. With that said will a can work on a blowback gun with a tilting barrel?Originally Posted by FlyingHunter
Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
“The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles."
Member
A suppressed lcp in 22 would be awesome lol. I have the lcp 2 and pocket carry it quite often. Great little pocket gun
Member
Not as fond of my LCP II as the earlier LCP, tho' the more Glockish trigger is an improvement.
A .22 trainer is a great idea. Have a .22 Short 950 that was an understudy for a .25 version.
No, the new Ruger won't make sense for defense, simply because of the round.
Moon
Senior Member
I also like the overall shape and feel of the original. Less blocky.
Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
“The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles."
Senior Member
Same, the LCPII is a clunker compared to the svelte original.
Senior Member
One thing I do kind of like on the II is the slightly wider back strap. It isn't as sharp as the smaller original. The original one sort of pokes me in the palm of my hand when I shoot it.
Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
“The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles."
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks