Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 36

Thread: Re-opening the muzzle brake can of worms.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,533
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)

    Cool Re-opening the muzzle brake can of worms.

    I'd like to have a discussion about muzzle brakes..... where they are appropriate and where not. Hoping it can be kept high level, I mean there will be various opinions I expect and hope, but there are also some facts that are irrefutable (in my opinion ). I'm not going to say things like, "if you run a muzzle brake you're stupid". I hope no one says "If guns are too loud for you either man up or get another job."

    First I'm not saying they should all disappear. If you want to run a brake for this or that application I don't see why not.... I say that despite my admitted anti-brake bias but I also admit to having used them in competition and just mucking around on the range. I even had brakes that I made and offered. I think they are still on my site but I haven't sold one in years and I'm fine with that! I would take them off but sometimes it's hard to get changes on the site. For something like PRS where you want to spot impact or three-gun where you want to take another second out of an 18-second stage, sure.

    My context for the discussion is police Patrol Rifle use and self-defense. Brakes are prohibido in our Patrol Rifle classes but once in a while, for various reasons, one gets through. My prime directive Monday mornings in class is to be the Brake Nazi. I do a visual survey of everything in the room, anywhere from say 22 to 36 guns. When I spot a brake I have a discussion with the student. If it's a brake that is a QD for a suppressor I ask if he has the can for it and there is only one right answer. When it's something else, I gently as possible inform that it has to come off. Most guys don't buck this-- either they didn't realize the issue or "it's what the Department gave me for the class." Sometimes it's "YES! I hate this thing, please take it off." Once in a while the student bucks me on it and wants to run it by the lead instructor, which is not me. This is universally guys that work where personally owned rifles are allowed and maybe the department does not have much or anything in the way of qualifying specs.

    These guys will say something like, "Do you know what I paid for this thing? Do you know how much recoil it takes out of the equation and how fast it enables me to shoot it?"

    We prohibit them because they are loud; often the owner doesn't realize it because he has not had to stand to the side of it while it's being shot. Most guys when they understand the issue, go along with the program. Some will go to lengths to keep it-- explaining all kinds of reasons why they should be able to keep it on. The advantages to them, or the ego and dollar investment, appear to be more important than the health of their line mates, coworkers, teammates. Yes, I find that inconsiderate, selfish, irresponsible, and irritating.

    They are not just loud. It's not just a big increase in noise, they also spew high-velocity particles and outright concussion. Our line gets packed a little tighter sometimes than we would like. I mean if we could run students 20' apart all the time that'd be great but it's not the reality of our situation or of most others. Translate this to a callout. Can you tell guys to make entry but don't be closer than 20' to each other? Anyway-- with some brakes 20' would not be enough even with double hearing protection. I mean, bare muzzle or proper flash hider at 20' is already way too loud with no protection.

    YES! Some are not as bad as others but the best of them in terms of less side blast are still egregious when you're 4-5' away... or closer. Tell me that an officer, or home defender, will never, ever have to fire a shot right now with a teammate or family member right alongside them. We do one evolution where I'm standing between two shooters no more than 3-4' away, observing. Even a 16" barrel with a standard birdcage, literally hurts my teeth. If it's a brake? I am simply not going to be there. Yes I've done it in the past but in recent years as we transitioned to the "no brakes " policy, I'm not going to be there any more, giving up even more hearing, shot by shot.

    Anyway, "the best of them", the least blasty, are less good at being a recoil reducer. I feel solid in saying this and have seen other opinions that it is so, although at the moment I can't cite where I saw them (because I don't remember). I'm not going to get into trying to rate them by brand and model as my experience with a great many of them has not been in an atmosphere conducive to taking the time to attempt it. Any ratings would be anecdotal but I can say that every last one was noticeably louder than a birdcage. Good 'nuff for me.

    In the last couple weeks of classes we (I) removed 5-6 brakes. I buy A1 flash hiders and loan them to guys for the class, or if they want to own it, $5. None of us instructors are there to sell stuff but you also can't give everything away. I often do though-- I lose most of them because at the end of the last day everything's a jumble and it's hard to track them all down and get them back. Guys aren't "sneaking off" with them, they just are in a hurry to get on the road and don't think about it. I don't care, it's well worth $5 a piece for 2-3 students per class, so no one has to deal with the brake hazard.

    We had one this week that was pinned and welded. For those I have collars that set-screw over them to shut them up for the week but I don't have multiple collars for every possible size, plus I'm down one that walked off last year. This week's guy, we put him on the end when possible. Could we remove it even though pinned and welded....? Yes-- and then someone, or everyone involved, is a felon-- 14.5" barrel once it's off. Screw an A1 on there without re-pinning and rewelding: felon. Stupid laws that help no one, make criminals out of people that do no harm other than not knowing, and actually endanger people..... even cops. Same as during the idiotic "Assault Weapon" Ban where you could have brakes but not flash hiders. My, think of all the lives that were saved.

    I wear 33db reduction plugs, plus muffs. I very frequently find that I have yet again unconsciously put my hands to my ears to try and seal out more noise. I am experimenting with gluing wetsuit or mousepad material to the outside of the ear shells of the muffs. My thinking is that the hard shell when struck by sound waves will transmit some to the inside-- I think the foamy rubber helps. They are electronic so of course I'm not covering the mics. I've tried to find electronic plugs that work, several are good as to electronics and controls but fail on noise attenuation. Anyway-- if I could find something, some combo, that worked perfectly-- it still does not solve the issue of firing a round alongside a partner / family member in an emergency.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,658
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Ned, where do linears like the [edit, apologies to Clint] BRT Covert Comp or blast shields like the Fortis Control Shield or Indian Creek BFD fit into this discussion?
    Last edited by Diamondback; 05-25-24 at 16:51.
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,105
    Feedback Score
    0
    I think they look cool. I have a SLR mini in titanium. I never could get it to change colors, it does reduce recoil and i havent noticed it being loud.
    But to rieterate they look cool.
    I tried to follow the science but it simply was not there. I then followed the money, thats where i found the science.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,533
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    I'm not familiar with any of those but the Noveske KX3 and 5 are good, as is the Witt SME. That's outside. I have not tested them in a hallway or "up against" something. "Up against" is part of the equation and I have an incident I'd like to relate but I am awaiting all the details and permission to discuss. My friend Drake Oldham did test this years ago and as I recall he rejected the KX3 because of reflected sound. We (me, any readers) need to test this! And the one ones you mentioned. But I'll say that muzzle brakes with shields over them I have generally found to be obnoxious, creating huge fireballs that give off a noise all their own in addition to the rifle's report. It's like having an M80 go off at the muzzle plus the sound of the gun firing. That and the fireball, make me ask, "how is this better?" Plus-- one such rig i looked at 4-5 years ago was $455 by the time you bought the brake and found it egregious and then bought the shield to tame it. Beautifully made stuff but replacing the A2 that came on the gun with it, for nothing but disadvantages in size, weight, noise and flash....? Didn't make sense.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,533
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Well.... I don't want to encourage you with your brake but.... put it in the oven at ~ 490 for a while. Not sure about Ti but on bare steel you'll get a beautiful bronze color.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    33,152
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    They are unbearable on 5.56 and have no place. Competition gays are no excuse.
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,105
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Ned Christiansen View Post
    Well.... I don't want to encourage you with your brake but.... put it in the oven at ~ 490 for a while. Not sure about Ti but on bare steel you'll get a beautiful bronze color.
    Im not sure its considered a brake more like a hybrid comp. But thanks for the info!
    I tried to follow the science but it simply was not there. I then followed the money, thats where i found the science.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,533
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Oh, correction! This week I replaced a brake with the BRT unit and it kinda did the KX3 thing, channeling the shytstorm forward. I will be comparing it to the KX3 and Witt in the coming weeks.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Deep South Texas
    Posts
    4,089
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    I ruined my ears growing up shooting thousands of doves sans plugs & am paying the price as the ringing never stops...heck, the A1 is freak'n loud. Has anyone used just a thread protector?? It's too bad dept's can't afford a handful of cans for classes.

    They work, but I have no use for them. Buddy was showing me some new fancy carry I never heard of & it had a dang break on it. Can be worse on a pistol.
    "You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass."
    Japanese Admiral Yamamoto, 1941




    "A wise man's heart directs him toward the right, but a foolish man's heart directs him toward the left."
    Ecclesiastes 10:2:

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,402
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    I was “that guy” because my Sandman came with a brake. Never used a brake before, so I bought the same brake for all my host guns. I went on one of those overpriced hog hunts with some coworkers and only about half brought hearing protection. I wanted faster swing and pulled the sandman off. After a volley of blasts even the guys with hearing protection wanted my sandman back on the weapon and one of them was shooting 300win mag. I have been converting everything to forward control flash hiders and never looked back.

    Ned, A2 policy. You loan them an A2, you hold the brake as collateral. I bet your success rate increases getting your A2’s back.

    Sound protection and wet suit on ear muffs…. I read where the sound waves also travel through your face/bones/etc and still create hearing loss. Maybe look at a neoprene face mask for winter courses. Maybe it would help limit the damage from shockwaves to the head.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •