Page 10 of 19 FirstFirst ... 89101112 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 182

Thread: MK18 Vs. Geissele Super Duty 10.5

  1. #91
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    78
    Feedback Score
    1 (67%)
    Its kinda like what saw offers. Without the suppressor it'll start short stroking.

  2. #92
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    2,584
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by elia.jon1 View Post
    Its kinda like what saw offers. Without the suppressor it'll start short stroking.
    Which are you referring to?

  3. #93
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    75
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by okie View Post
    There's not much information out there. The Mk18 bolts were breaking at random intervals, so they started putting out feelers for a tougher bolt. That's when LMT came up with the enhanced bolt. Colt figured out how to toughen up the legacy bolt at the last minute, at no additional cost, so that was the obvious choice..
    Pretty sure the issue with Mk18 and also M4A1 at the time was QC issue at Colt in early 2000s instead of a TDP change. Colt fixed the QC problem and the issues largely went away, rather than a change to TDP.

  4. #94
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    78
    Feedback Score
    1 (67%)
    Quote Originally Posted by okie View Post
    Which are you referring to?
    A 6921 cut to 10.3 without opening the gas port. I was asked if it would cycle when shot down near freezing.

    It won't, specialized armament offers a similar barrel for suppressor use and says it won't work reliably without the can.

  5. #95
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Free Pineland, NC
    Posts
    180
    Feedback Score
    0
    Well, to the OP, I'd say what is your mission requirement, and what do you think you'll need to accomplish it. That would largely determine what components I would chose for a "MK 18" style rifle. And by that I mean a SBR meant for CQB. Lots of issues have been covered in this thread. Especially concerning using Colt parts vs other vendors.

    The only thing I'd add. While I agree with Okie, in that a cut-down 6920 would fit the bill nicely here, the issue for me is whether "TDP" type quality is even required. The argument was made that only Colt can truly claim to have this "mil-spec" quality, and has the track record to prove it. If we accept this as the case, then the question for me is do I really need this, or not. I found it amusing that while Okie argues for Colt, as the ultimate expression in things AR, he also states that the average AR-owner probably doesn't shoot more than a couple of hundred rounds through it. So you're saying here's the highest quality rifle available, but the vast majority have no need for it.

    I think I'm somewhere in the middle of this here. I don't shoot 10K+ rds a year like some guys, but I shoot more than a couple of hundred for sure. So I want a certain level of quality, but I don't require a "battle-beast", whatever that may be. So to the OP, what is his firing schedule, and does he require TDP level of quality, or not? To me that is what would determine if you need Crane/NSW MK-18 parts, or big G, or whoever.
    Working for Crossfire Australia, a military rucksack and load-bearing equipment company. Still doing limited design and development of nylon LBE.

  6. #96
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    562
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ta0117 View Post
    Pretty sure the issue with Mk18 and also M4A1 at the time was QC issue at Colt in early 2000s instead of a TDP change. Colt fixed the QC problem and the issues largely went away, rather than a change to TDP.
    Where did you hear that it was QC issues at Colt with MK18 and M4A1?
    How did they fix said QC issues with Mk18 and M4A1 and what where they?
    Last edited by indianalex01; 10-21-21 at 09:51.

  7. #97
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    2,584
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by elia.jon1 View Post
    A 6921 cut to 10.3 without opening the gas port. I was asked if it would cycle when shot down near freezing.

    It won't, specialized armament offers a similar barrel for suppressor use and says it won't work reliably without the can.
    Gotcha. But it will cycle in cold weather with the suppressor, right?

  8. #98
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    2,584
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by indianalex01 View Post
    Where did you hear that it was QC issues at Colt with MK18 and M4A1?
    How did they fix said QC issues with Mk18 and M4A1 and what where they?
    Idk what he's talking about either. That wasn't the way I heard it at all. I wonder if he's confusing the extractor fiasco though, because that happened around the same time, and was due to QC issues. But it was a very small batch, and it did end up leading to the current extractor kit, which is pretty bad ass.

  9. #99
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    562
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by okie View Post
    Idk what he's talking about either. That wasn't the way I heard it at all. I wonder if he's confusing the extractor fiasco though, because that happened around the same time, and was due to QC issues. But it was a very small batch, and it did end up leading to the current extractor kit, which is pretty bad ass.
    He was just spewing nonsense. It’s never ending with Colt Haters. Just have to push on.

    I have a colt Mk18 upper with stock gas port. It runs with federal 223 and 556.

  10. #100
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    1,434
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    I thought the change that helped the carbines back then was the heavier buffers and the copper extractor spring and black insert?!

Page 10 of 19 FirstFirst ... 89101112 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •