<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
Psalms 109:8, 43:1
LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.
With out a positive test or a docs prescription?
From WaPo
So much for healthcare decisions being made between you and your doctor.Now the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services will, at least temporarily, set the rules for distribution of monoclonal antibodies instead of allowing states, medical facilities and doctors to order them directly.
Why should we provide medical care to the VAX or maskers, their mothers could’ve just aborted them and saved us the money. That’s about the parallel argument to the one they’re making about unvaccinated people not being eligible for medical care.
Maybe the ER docs here shouldn’t treat gun shot wound victims who didn’t have a CCW or body armor. You know had the ability to protect yourself.
That is a lot of hatred. And how are unvaxxed a danger to the vax’d? And if only we have vax’d more this wouldn’t be happening, like in Israel....
There is so much hatred. Maybe the best comment back is just that. “Wow, that is a lot of hatred....”.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
This thread is a great example of why 'science' is such a bad 'leader'. "Follow the science..." is complete BS for anyone that has either been a leader or a scientist. Science is about knowledge and facts. Leadership is about the application of scarce resources. Those two things are totally separate things. "Follow the science" leads to forced sterilizations and Tuskegee experiments. The NAZIs had excellent biomedical experimental programs. The idea that we are aiming for 'zero-COVID' is a science lead decision that doesn't take in account non-COVID issues. Leaders, without scientific knowledge can make crappy decisions.
Leaders have to make decisions based on scientific data that weigh uncertainty of the information and the competing constituencies.
Follow the science leads to the cattle cars...
Asking a doctor like Fauci what the national response should be is like asking a chef what our farming and food distribution system should be- WAY out of his depth.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...eeded-florida/
B picked it up...
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass."
Japanese Admiral Yamamoto, 1941
"A wise man's heart directs him toward the right, but a foolish man's heart directs him toward the left."
Ecclesiastes 10:2:
At this point there is no convincing me that Biden and the people calling the shots are nothing but pure evil. They’d rather watch people die because those people found a different option than the one offered to them by the establishment.
That goes for all the little rabbib followers too. Pure evil.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This is just an experimental treatment from big pharma to cash in at over $2,100 a dose. You don’t need any of this if you are healthy because the survival rate of covid is like 99.9% anyway unless you’re obese, in which case get to exercising and eating your vegetables. You guys fell for this one hook line and sinker if you don’t think it’s just lining the wallets of politicians who are buddy buddy with Regeneron.
Bookmarks