https://m.sfgate.com/bayarea/article...medium=ios_app
So does this mean that city employees who are NRA members will be fired or possibly worse because of their membership?
https://m.sfgate.com/bayarea/article...medium=ios_app
So does this mean that city employees who are NRA members will be fired or possibly worse because of their membership?
A person who is not inwardly prepared for the use of violence against him is always weaker than the person committing the violence. - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago
In no way do I make any money from anyone related to the firearms industry.
"I have never heard anyone say after a firefight that I wish that I had not taken so much ammo.", ME
"Texas can make it without the United States, but the United States can't make it without Texas !", General Sam Houston
Given the demographically more common black criminality; what does that make the NAACP?
Or ACT UP/GLAAD for people intentionally spreading HIV?
Yes, this will definitely fix SF’s:
1. Homeless problem
2. Poop on the sidewalks problem
3. Drug use problem
4. Rampant crime problem (30,000 car break-ins last year and still going strong)
Yes, well played by the mentally ill SF government.
Philippians 2:10-11
To argue with a person who renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead. ~ Thomas Paine
“The greatest conspiracy theory is the notion that your government cares about you”- unknown.
The City of San Francisco should be adjudicated mentally incompetent and treated as such.
What if this whole crusade's a charade?
And behind it all there's a price to be paid
For the blood which we dine
Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…
"I'll take 'how is San Francisco relevant?' for $200, Alex...."
And Jose Ines Garcia-Zarate, who actually shot and killed Kate Steinle while in San Fran, isn't guilty of murder or manslaughter....
Sanctuary cities kill more people than the NRA....
Last edited by FromMyColdDeadHand; 09-04-19 at 12:41.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
I can't see how anyone can think this is funny. You are being marginalized, scapegoated. They are prepping the battle space, the public square, moving the Overton Window, with the ultimate purpose of your elimination. That's what this and other efforts like it are. Period. If you don't understand and see this for what it truly is, you're wrong.
The truth can only offend those who live a lie.
Bookmarks