Assault Weapons Ban 2019

[Wake27]

As disturbing and horrible as the prospect of a large-scale civil conflict is, I'm starting to become even more disturbed by the realization that we really don't have the means, or the will, to pull it off.

I think that is entirely accurate. At least the will part. The means would be fine if we had the will.

[WickedWillis]

I think that is entirely accurate. At least the will part. The means would be fine if we had the will.

What means do we have that is fool-proof and will benefit us? Writing our representatives is nice, but it's also the assumption that they truly care.

[SteyrAUG]

As disturbing and horrible as the prospect of a large-scale civil conflict is, I'm starting to become even more disturbed by the realization that we really don't have the means, or the will, to pull it off.

Fear not, wherever shirtless men stand prepared to put down dumpster offenders, brave defenders of freedom will do what other more learned men won't.

The battle cry will be "doubt it."

[flenna]

Fear not, wherever shirtless men stand prepared to put down dumpster offenders, brave defenders of freedom will do what other more learned men won't.

The battle cry will be "doubt it."

[badguybuster]

My concern is that the Dems will offer Trump the wall i exchange for gun control. Its a win-win for them

[Firefly]

I'd sooner have a gun than a wall.

I still say it is every American's duty to breed Latin women in the wheatfields

[Phillygunguy]

Soon there will come a time where you have to decide, do you die fighting for your 2A rights now? or give up your rights and die in a mass grave later.

[Buckaroo]

I'd sooner have a gun than a wall.

Might need to be a t-shirt slogan so we can recruit the masses...

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

[Submariner]

Americans dont need AR15s but my private security needs state of the art kit because Politicians Lives Matter.

THEY SAY: “Those assault rifles have no sporting purpose. You don’t need a 30-round magazine for hunting deer they’re only for killing people.”

WE SAY: “I compete in DCM (now CMP) High Power with my AR-15. You need a large-capacity magazine for their course of fire. My SKS is a fine deer rifle, and I’ve never done anything to give my government reason not to trust me, blah, blah, blah.” (FLAW: You have implicitly conceded that it is OK to ban any gun with no sporting use. And eventually they can replace your sporting arms with arcade-game substitutes.)

WE SHOULD SAY: “Your claim that ‘they’re only for killing people’ is imprecise. A gas chamber or electric chair is designed for killing people, and these devices obviously serve different functions than guns. To be precise, a high capacity military-type rifle or handgun is designed for CONFLICT. When I need to protect myself and my freedom, I want the most reliable, most durable, highest capacity weapon possible. The only thing hunting and target shooting have to do with freedom is that they’re good practice.”

Give It to Them Straight
by John Ross
Author of Unintended Consequences

https://www.floridaconcealedcarry.co...ight-John-Ross

[Firefly]

If the Jews in Germany had beltfeds and rockets, would it have made a difference?

OOOH the buts and the ums and the 'that's different' get DELISH when I trot that one out