Page 23 of 24 FirstFirst ... 1321222324 LastLast
Results 221 to 230 of 234

Thread: Pit Bull Attack

  1. #221
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Black Hills, South Dakota
    Posts
    4,711
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by pag23 View Post
    Then those agents get reassigned to sh!tty posts like the Clintons....
    LOL.

    The Clintons are so bad getting bitten by a GSD every now and then is preferable.

    Maybe the dog just knows that the agents are Feds. He can sense their love for killing people’s dogs, and he’s defending himself.

  2. #222
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durham, NC
    Posts
    6,978
    Feedback Score
    23 (100%)
    Thread revival. I just read something from the World Animal Foundation, pit bulls make up less than 6% of the the dog population but responsible for 70% of all bites.

  3. #223
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Lowcountry, SC.
    Posts
    6,336
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by chuckman View Post
    Thread revival. I just read something from the World Animal Foundation, pit bulls make up less than 6% of the the dog population but responsible for 70% of all bites.
    I’m a little curious on how that data gets reported and confirmed.

  4. #224
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durham, NC
    Posts
    6,978
    Feedback Score
    23 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by 1168 View Post
    I’m a little curious on how that data gets reported and confirmed.
    Here is more: https://worldanimalfoundation.org/ad...te-statistics/

    I imagine if you contact them they'd share their methodology.

  5. #225
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    2,746
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by chuckman View Post
    Thread revival. I just read something from the World Animal Foundation, pit bulls make up less than 6% of the the dog population but responsible for 70% of all bites.
    6% population sounds about right but not 70% of all bites. If the type bite was categorized as fatal then 70% might be closer. WAF is generally an apologist for pit bulls... misidentified, abused... on and on.

  6. #226
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Lowcountry, SC.
    Posts
    6,336
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by chuckman View Post
    Here is more: https://worldanimalfoundation.org/ad...te-statistics/

    I imagine if you contact them they'd share their methodology.
    Rgr, thanks.

    Edit: I’m going to have to do a lot of fact checking on that site. First thing I saw was: “The third deadliest creature on Earth is a dog.” I find that hard to believe in a world containing humans, mosquitoes, snakes, and parasites/pathogens.

    Edit2: they made that “3rd deadliest” statistic up out of thin air.
    Last edited by 1168; 03-26-24 at 13:13.

  7. #227
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durham, NC
    Posts
    6,978
    Feedback Score
    23 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ChattanoogaPhil View Post
    6% population sounds about right but not 70% of all bites. If the type bite was categorized as fatal then 70% might be closer. WAF is generally an apologist for pit bulls... misidentified, abused... on and on.
    I don't know anything about them (WAF). I stumbled on that while searching for something about Jack Russells. It seems they do a lousy job as pit apologists as they could squeeze the data to be more favorable to them.

  8. #228
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    2,746
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by chuckman View Post
    I don't know anything about them (WAF). I stumbled on that while searching for something about Jack Russells. It seems they do a lousy job as pit apologists as they could squeeze the data to be more favorable to them.
    According to the link you posted pit bulls are involved in near 70% of all bite fatalities, not 70% of all bites. It's in a BIG pie chart in the link.
    Last edited by ChattanoogaPhil; 03-26-24 at 13:05.

  9. #229
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    15,600
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ChattanoogaPhil View Post
    6% population sounds about right .
    I'm thinking I'm seeing a heck of a lot more than 6% a lot of them are mixed.

  10. #230
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Lowcountry, SC.
    Posts
    6,336
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Averageman View Post
    I'm thinking I'm seeing a heck of a lot more than 6% a lot of them are mixed.
    you may be right. Last time I looked, some kennel clubs don’t really recognize it as a breed in the first place. So even a “purebred” might not be seen in the statistics being reported. Where many of the ones we see in the course of our lives are mixed. It’s a poorly enough defined breed that the definitions wander and are sometimes in the eye of the beholder.

Page 23 of 24 FirstFirst ... 1321222324 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •