Page 7 of 14 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 132

Thread: Black Hills 5.56mm 77 gr TMK and 69 gr TMK Review

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Republic of Texas
    Posts
    633
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)
    On Thursday, I shot several different factory match loads through the LaRue Stealth barrel at 100 yards to check accuracy. Black Hills 556 77 gr TMK results were better this time...

    Attachment 45183

    ...and Black Hills 556 69 gr TMK's were ok...

    Attachment 45186

    ...however, still inferior to Hornady Match 75 223 gr OTM and Black Hills 556 77 gr OTM...

    Attachment 45184Attachment 45185

    Test was done shooting prone off a bipod with light wind at about 83 degrees. Interesting to me that the TMK's aren't doing better than the OTM loads. Perhaps the barrel just likes the OTM better.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    8,431
    Feedback Score
    9 (100%)
    We didn't do a complete study, but our impression was the TMK, cuts wind better and better ballistics, but the OTM's were grouped a little better. For a battle round, it's about a wash because either will get the job done. Good ammo.

    PB
    Last edited by Pappabear; 04-22-17 at 16:55.
    "Air Force / Policeman / Fireman / Man of God / Friend of mine / R.I.P. Steve Lamy"

  3. #63
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,797
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Barrels all have their own opinion. My SS410 Bravo barrel shoots 75 gr Hornady better with three powders. I'm finally getting acceptable accuracy from 77 gr SMKs with Varget, which won't run through a progressive press as consistently as a ball powder.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Republic of Texas
    Posts
    633
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Pappabear View Post
    We didn't do a complete study, but our impression was the TMK, cuts wind better and better ballistics, but the OTM's were grouped a little better. For a battle round, it's about a wash because either will get the job done. Good ammo.

    PB
    I agree that at distance, the TKM's really shine, as they don't get blown around very much. Once I've found the correct hold over, I get consistent hits on the gong at 500 yards, even with windy conditions.

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    8,431
    Feedback Score
    9 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by tylerw02 View Post
    Barrels all have their own opinion. My SS410 Bravo barrel shoots 75 gr Hornady better with three powders. I'm finally getting acceptable accuracy from 77 gr SMKs with Varget, which won't run through a progressive press as consistently as a ball powder.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    We use H322, Russian primers with remarkable results. Our 77's Nosler and SMK AND TMK sub moa with multiple barrels.
    Varget seems like a ruff way to go for 223 AMMO.

    Let me know if you want load data, best of luck

    PB
    "Air Force / Policeman / Fireman / Man of God / Friend of mine / R.I.P. Steve Lamy"

  6. #66
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,797
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Sure I'd love to see it.

    My current recipes for most of my rifles is TAC, CCI 450s and 7x gr bullets of whichever flavor.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Mid-West, USA
    Posts
    2,827
    Feedback Score
    63 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by tylerw02 View Post
    Sure I'd love to see it.

    My current recipes for most of my rifles is TAC, CCI 450s and 7x gr bullets of whichever flavor.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    PappaBear's load info has worked well for me with SMKs, TMKs, and 75gr BTHPs. Their 69gr SMK load has also worked well in every rifle I've ever used it in.

    What is your TAC load?

  8. #68
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,797
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    I would have to look it up but I want to say it's 23.8.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,948
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Our goal for tomorrow it so get a confirmed 1300 yard hit with the 77 gr TMK. We've never had a NO DOUBT 1300 yard confirmed hit with anything under .308 due to the bullet running out of ass at that distance, but we're shooting that trial first thing in the morning.
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  10. #70
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    UT
    Posts
    445
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by tylerw02 View Post
    I would have to look it up but I want to say it's 23.8.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    This is a money load for me with 77gr Noslers and CCI41s. 23.7 or 23.8gr of TAC works equally well. Very consistent sub-moa results in a 223 wylde Rainier arms 18" ultra-match.

    Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

Page 7 of 14 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •