It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.
Chuck, we miss ya man.
كافر
It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.
Chuck, we miss ya man.
كافر
The ones I've seen aren't "light switch" kills, but they also don't run a couple hundred yards. I've seen plenty of hunters take first shot hits where the animal drops or gets no further than 15 yards. I've also seen the same hunters pass up possible shots when they weren't confident of being able to do the same.
Wouldn't be the first time somebody suggested I was a PETA hunter, but that is how I was raised I guess. As the OP stated, he didn't have the best tool for the job, and really that is the only comment I am making.
It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.
Chuck, we miss ya man.
كافر
Cant pass up a 20 yard shot just because you have a 9mm. Of course that is the minimum caliber I would use. I don't think it was an unethical choice at all. Congrats.
Nope, I saw that. But to me 9mm isn't an ethical hog gun. Same as a 22lr isn't an ethical deer gun. But I know lots of guys with meat in the freezer from a 22lr deer kill.
It is a personal preference. I doubt you'll change my mind any faster than I'll change yours on this. In the end a hog is dead and that is a win in my book.
Steyr, you keep saying the ones you've "seen". Have you actually taken an animal or more than one and had to make that judgement call yourself? What I'm having a hard time with is your use of words like "needless suffering" because I shot an animal more than once, even though it only ran a few yards before expiring. Then you say a large game animal being shot with a rifle & running a short distance is OK. How is one "needless suffering" & the other OK? It seems that the only distinction is what weapon was used. Considering the results and the particular circumstances involved, I would do the same thing if the opportunity presented itself again.
Bookmarks