OK guys here is a pic. of the various popular AR-15/AR-10/LR-308
cartridges in comparison to the 6.5mm PCC round...
From left to right:
.223 Rem./5.56mm NATO, 6.5mm PCC, 7.62x39mm, .308 Win./7.62x51mm NATO.
Thanks.
OK guys here is a pic. of the various popular AR-15/AR-10/LR-308
cartridges in comparison to the 6.5mm PCC round...
From left to right:
.223 Rem./5.56mm NATO, 6.5mm PCC, 7.62x39mm, .308 Win./7.62x51mm NATO.
Thanks.
Didn't Chuck Taylor play with with 6.5/.223 wildcat in an ar back in the 80's? 6.5 TCU? I always liked the 6.5's. right in the middle of 30 cal and .223. When the 6.8 came out I wondered why they didn't go with a 6.5/223 just to avoid mag issues.
Tag for interest. Nice work.
Owner/ Operator, Trojan Tactical LLC. TROTAC.com
Thank you for posting comparison pictures.
Member of the JPFO, NRA, and TSRA!
Your welcome, I love that "Republic of Texas" theme...
More Info. can be had here:
http://illirianengineeringc.ipage.com/
This would be interesting in a CZ 527, and very easy to do since its a .223 based action. Of course so would a grendel with the 7.62x39 version.
This round would do even better in a CZ-527 action, as there would
not be such a restrictive magazine length Issue as In the AR-15 platform...
I would predict it would match or even exceed Grendelballistics. It would also
have the ability to safely run at higher pressures...
Well you would be restricted by the magazine on the CZ.
Bookmarks