Page 11 of 19 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 185

Thread: Glock Froglube vs FIREclean

  1. #101
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    1,189
    Feedback Score
    0
    So what happen on day 3 ??
    The price of liberty is, always has been, and always will be blood: The person who is not willing to die for his liberty has already lost it to the first scoundrel who is willing to risk dying to violate that person's liberty! Are you free?
    --- Andrew Ford

  2. #102
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    231
    Feedback Score
    0
    Dave from FIREClean stopped by at our stand during the IWA expo in Germany. He introduced the product and left several samples to us to try out.

    I had a HK416 that needed a cleanup. I did not even follow their instructions properly, just wanted to clean it quickly before going home that day.

    Applied the FIREClean on all of the fouled parts and let them sit for a few minutes.

    Then just wiped the fouling off. The HK416 / HK417 have been really user friendly with regards to ease of cleaning, but this really did the trick the easiest that I have seen.

    The rifle had c. 2-3K rounds through it after the last proper clean ( estimate as I don’t run an exact log book on this particular one )



    Looks to work well, I have now applied the lube to my competition Glock also.

    I am usually doubtful, as many here probably are, about something new that "does it all", whether that is in lubes or anything else related to firearms. I will see how it performs in the long run.

    Regards!

    Tuukka Jokinen
    Ase Utra sound suppressors

  3. #103
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    6,762
    Feedback Score
    11 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by 223to45 View Post
    So what happen on day 3 ??
    Nothing special, really. Carbine feels about the same as it did with LPX, nothing rusted, worked fine. It wasn't rougher, wasn't smoother. There was, however, more carbon build up on the bolt tail. Everything else seemed identical to the LPX product.

    I removed this information from this forum because one of the manufacturers of the products contacted me and was not pleased with my test method.
    Last edited by WS6; 05-01-13 at 21:39.

  4. #104
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    6,762
    Feedback Score
    11 (100%)
    I removed this information from this forum because one of the manufacturers of the products contacted me and was not pleased with my test methodology.
    Last edited by WS6; 05-01-13 at 21:38.

  5. #105
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    3,095
    Feedback Score
    7 (89%)
    [QUOTE=WS6;1628602]Little test I'm doing, take it FWIW to you.
    -Sanded/bare allen wrench
    -Saltwater laden 4-plies of toilet tissue (2 ply, folded)
    -Heat-gun (Froglube side of allen wrench was heated).
    -Time

    [

    I don't see that as a good way to show rust prevention. The cloth will negatively affect alot of lubricants and I cannot remember the last time I wrapped my rifle in a salt water cloth. A better way would be to spray it with salt water mist.
    Last edited by sinlessorrow; 05-01-13 at 22:34.
    Quote Originally Posted by C4IGrant View Post
    Colt builds War Horses, not show ponies.
    Quote Originally Posted by Iraqgunz View Post
    This is 2012. The world is going to end this December and people are still trying to debate the merits of piece of shit, cost cutting crap AR's. Really?

  6. #106
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,948
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by 223to45 View Post
    So what happen on day 3 ??
    Jesus rose in fulfillment of the Scriptures.
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  7. #107
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,646
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Just find something that works well, make sure you can afford it and that it's available, and move on.
    Ken Bloxton
    Skill > Gear

  8. #108
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by WS6 View Post
    Another nice thing is the published coefficient of friction. Very very low. Lowest, ever, they claim...I googled really fast and couldn't find one lower (other than air/magnet bearings), so who knows?
    Easy to find:

    Coefficient of Friction of Ice on Steel: 0.03
    Coefficient of Friction of Ice on Ice: 0.02
    Coefficient of Friction of Rand CLP (Ball Bearings): 0.017
    Coefficient of Friction of Synovial Fluid (Cartilage): 0.0044-0.0057
    Coefficient of Friction of Tendon-Tendon Sheath Interface: 0.0013 (lubricated with Synovial Fluid)

  9. #109
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    6,762
    Feedback Score
    11 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by cqbdoc10 View Post
    Easy to find:

    Coefficient of Friction of Ice on Steel: 0.03
    Coefficient of Friction of Ice on Ice: 0.02
    Coefficient of Friction of Rand CLP (Ball Bearings): 0.017
    Coefficient of Friction of Synovial Fluid (Cartilage): 0.0044-0.0057
    Coefficient of Friction of Tendon-Tendon Sheath Interface: 0.0013 (lubricated with Synovial Fluid)
    Rand CLP is 0.008. Maybe not the best, then, but pretty darn good!

  10. #110
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    7,473
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)
    Just looked at Rand CLP. They lost me at "nano infused."

Page 11 of 19 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •